Results

Click on the icon to see the results

─► How public health can save new generations from obesity? – Experts views on strategies for implementing nutrition policies in Europe. – M4.1-2

─► Health equity impact of Best-ReMaP – literature review

─► Summary of evidence, using the Best-ReMap framework – Food Reformulation

─► Summary of evidence, using the Best-ReMap framework – Food Marketing

─► Summary of evidence, using the Best-ReMap framework – Public Food Procurement

─► How to follow the nutritional quality of the food offer: presentation of the Oqali model – M5.1(1)

─► Actions taken during the Best-ReMaP project to follow the nutritional quality of the food offer – M5.1(2)

─► Identification of priority food groups for the data collection of the Best-ReMaP project – M5.2

─► How to collect and codify the data for a first data collection at branded level (state of play of the nutritional quality of the food offer) – M5.3(1)

─► How to treat the data after the first data collection at branded level (verifications to handle and indicators to produce) – M5.3(2)

─► How to collect and codify the data to follow the evolution of the nutritional quality of the food offer (for countries having preexisting data) – M5.4(1)

─► How to treat the data after a second (follow-up) data collection at branded level (verifications to handle) – M5.4(2)

─► How to treat the data after a second (follow-up) data collection at branded level (indicators to produce) – M5.4(3)

─► How to collect and codify the data to follow the evolution of the nutritional quality of the food offer (for countries using Euremo’s data) – M5.5 & M5.6

─► Guidelines for processed food monitoring – D5.1

─► Guidelines for a European monitoring system of the processed food supply – D5.2

─► Report on reformulation monitoring – Annexes D5.3

─► Complete Best-ReMaP classification in categories and subcategories: Excel version

─► Correspondence between FoodEx2 and Best-ReMaP (only the 5 categories considered for Best-ReMaP): Excel version

─► T0 statistics programs for the five categories considered for Best-ReMaP (Bread products, Breakfast cereals, Delicatessen meats and similar, Fresh dairy products and desserts, Soft drinks) : data cleaning and treatment for the state of play of the nutritional quality of the food offer at branded level

─► T0 statistics programs for all the Best-ReMaP categories : data cleaning and treatment for the state of play of the nutritional quality of the food offer at branded level

T1 statistics programs: data cleaning and treatment for the follow-up of the nutritional quality of the food offer at branded level

─►T1 statistics programs

─►T1 permutation tests

─►Template for data entry and encoding in Best-ReMaP categories and subcategories : for state of play (T0) and follow-up (T1) data

─►Template for entry and encoding in Best-ReMaP categories and subcategories : for preexisting data (prior to Best-ReMaP)

─►Guidelines for data classification in Best-ReMaP categories and subcategories : Bread products, Breakfast cereals, Delicatessen meats and similar, Fresh dairy products and desserts, Soft drinks, Baby food, Infant milks, Cakes and biscuits

─►Notice for the use of the templates for data entry and encoding

Implementing Food Marketing Codes to Protect Children’s Health and Rights

─► Policy Brief

─► Leaflet

─► An EU harmonised approach using the WHO nutrient profile model for the identification of foods not permitted for marketing to children – D6.1

─► Technical Guidance for codes of practice to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children – D6.2

─► Piloting the EU-wide monitoring protocol for unhealthy food marketing – report from the Best-ReMaP Joint Action studies – D6.3

─► Establishment of the EU Expert Group and national intersectoral working group – M6.1

─► A workshop on how to use adapt and implement the EU harmonised nutrient profile model – M6.2

─► Regulation and legislation mapping report – M6.3

─► Workshop on how to implement Codes of Practice to reduce unhealthy food marketing to children – M6.4

─► Monitoring marketing of unhealthy foods to children: Comparison and evaluation of existing protocols, with stakeholder consultation

This review provides key definitions and introduces monitoring methods. It describes and compares four identified existing protocols (WHO, WHO-CLICK, INFORMAS, Nordic) for scope, topics, and techniques; outlines gaps and challenges; and provides interim recommendations for the proposed EU-wide monitoring protocol.
Report is available here

─► Overview applicative situation analyses of the existing EU and national legislation – D7.1

─► Knowledge transfer trainings on legislative context, assessment needs of regional public institutions; catalogue and composition of foods and its use in public procurement- D7.2

─► Selection of the public institutions types for participation – M7.1

─► Inter sectoral public procurements working group workshops – M7.2

─► Pilot protocol development – M7.3

─► Execution of a joint public tender for food procurement – M7.4

─► Public food procurement evaluation – M7.5

The content of this website represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility; it cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

Follow us on social media

Facebook Instagram Youtube Envelope